Ms. Saunders sued Dr. Dickens for medical malpractice, arguing he did not do enough tests to properly diagnose her husband's spinal problems. The jury ruled for Dr. Dickens, and the Fourth District Court of Appeal did as well. Ms. Saunders' appeal to this Court argues that she should be given a new trial because the defense attorney made an improper closing argument at trial and that the 4th DCA's decision is in conflict with decisions from two other district courts of appeal in similar cases.