December 5, 2012
Washington National Insurance Corp. V. Sydelle Ruderman
Case Number(s):
SC12-323
Loading the player...

This video requires Adobe Flash to be installed and activated on your browser to play. Because modern browsers are turning off the Flash feature, please verify in your browser settings that you have allowed wfsu.org. You can find instructions for your browser online. Try these instructions for Chrome and these for Firefox.

Transcript:

Summary:

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has asked this Court what Florida law requires in cases where the meaning of a provision in an insurance policy is ambiguous. Washington National argues there is no ambiguity in its home health care policy and cites various documents as proof. Ms. Ruderman and others argue language in the policy providing an 8 percent annual increase in benefits is ambiguous and should be interpreted in their favor.

Statewide impact